Allow them, but only if operators pay their full grid costs and meet strict conditions.
5 reasons6 sources
What this position proposes
No pause, but binding rules: special power tariffs for large loads, limits on water use, renewable power and waste heat reuse, and public reporting.
Reasons
- 1.
Special tariffs can make data centers pay for the grid built for them.
Under AEP Ohio's tariff, approved in July 2025, new data centers of 25 MW or more pay for at least 85% of their contracted power for up to 12 years, whether they use it or not.[1]
- 2.
Tariffs like this are quickly becoming normal.
At least 38 large-load tariffs were set up in the US between 2018 and 2026, 30 of them in 2025 and 2026.[1]
- 3.
Conditions can be written into law.
In Germany, new data centers must cover their electricity with renewable power from 2027, reach a power usage effectiveness (PUE) of 1.2 and reuse a rising share of their waste heat.[1]
- 4.
Water use depends mostly on cooling design, which rules can steer.
Google's air-cooled data center in Pflugerville, Texas used about 10,000 gallons in 2024, while its site in Council Bluffs, Iowa used about 1 billion.[1]
- 5.
A blanket pause also blocks projects communities want.
Maine's governor vetoed a moratorium in April 2026 because it would have stopped a $550 million data center in Jay with strong local support.[1]
Anyone can add a reason, an objection or a source here. You create a free account when you publish. Already have one? Sign in.